RT News

Showing posts with label Abbas Milani; Nazila Fathi; Rafsanjani. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abbas Milani; Nazila Fathi; Rafsanjani. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Barred from poll, Rafsanjani calls Iranian leaders ignorant

Thu, May 23 05:45 AM EDT By Marcus George and Yeganeh Torbati DUBAI (Reuters) - Former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani has accused Iran's leadership of incompetence and ignorance just days after he was barred from standing in an election next month, the opposition Kaleme website reported on Thursday. Rafsanjani's comments appeared to add to the political conflict between those loyal to the leadership and opposition groups who have been marginalized since post-election unrest in 2009.
"I don't think the country could have been run worse, even if it had been planned in advance," Rafsanjani said to members of his campaign team on Wednesday, according to the Kaleme report. "I don't want to stoop to their propaganda and attacks but ignorance is troubling. Don't they understand what they're doing?"
Before he was disqualified from next month's presidential election, the 78-year-old Rafsanjani caused high interest in a ballot many believe was a race between hardliners. He attracted the endorsement of reformist groups whose leaders had disputed the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Rafsanjani did not indicate specifically who he was addressing but after the unrest following Ahmadinejad re-election in 2009, he criticized the authorities heavy-handed response and has since been regarded as a threat to the establishment.
The two-term president warned of "dangerous" threats from the United States and Israel, which have threatened to use military action against what they suspect is Iran's development of nuclear weapons. He said he had not realized his candidacy would create a wave in the country but that it was a sign of people's despair. Now was the time to stay calm, he said. "In no instance should people despair. There will be a day when those who must come, will come," he said, an apparent reference to advocates for political and social reforms who have been sidelined.
With Rafsanjani and Ahmadinejad's close ally, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaie, now out of the picture, the election field is again dominated by hardliners loyal to Iran's clerical leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Rafsanjani's ally Hassan Rohani, a former nuclear negotiator, and reformist Mohammad Aref, remain in the contest.
Rafsanjani said the experiences of rebuilding the country after the Iran-Iraq war was one that was needed now. He was elected president in 1989, a year after the war ended, and his administration came to be called the "government of reconstruction", an era when economic rebuilding and reform put Iran back on its feet. "The foreigners called me "easy man" because it took no time before the doors opened. Now that experience could be easily used again, except back then, people were sympathetic." According to the report, Rafsanjani - regarded as one of the founding fathers of the Islamic Republic - said he should not have run. "There was a flood of letters and telephone calls from Najaf, Qom and Mashhad, all major clerics for my candidacy. How could I be so obstinate and say no to them, especially to the youth?"
Analysts say he was disqualified from the election because he campaign had already become hugely popular and he was regarded as a threat to the leadership. (Editing by Angus MacSwan) ======================================== Iran's Khamenei says has no favourite to succeed Ahmadinejad Wed, May 29 07:46 AM EDT * Ayatollah is supposed to be above political fray * Says has no favourite, but candidates already been vetted * Ahaminejad's successor to be elected next month By Yeganeh Torbati DUBAI, May 29 (Reuters) - Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said on Wednesday he does not favour any candidate for June's presidential election, although hardliners with outlooks similar to his dominate the field. The field of candidates was narrowed considerably last week when the Guardian Council, a body of clerics and jurists that vets all candidates, disqualified two independent contenders - former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Esfandiar Rahim Mashaie, a close aide of current President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Reformists, who ran at the last election four years ago, have been largely excluded this time, with the leaders of the "Green movement", that protested against what they said was a rigged result, under unofficial house arrest for more than the last two years. Analysts say Khamenei is intent on seeing a loyal and docile candidate enter office after the unrest that followed the 2009 election. Though he initially had Khamenei's backing, Ahmadinejad challenged the supreme leader throughout his second term and has lost favour with the conservative establishment. Khamenei said on Wednesday that any notion that he had a favourite to win this time was wrong. "These things have always been said and it's not true, because no one knows who the leader will vote for," Khamenei said in a speech to parliamentarians, according to his website. "Just like everyone else, the leader only has one vote." Although supposedly above the fray of everyday politics, Khamenei endorsed Ahmadinejad's disputed victory in 2009. The months of protests that followed were eventually crushed by security forces. Iran's leaders have always denied vote rigging and said the unrest had been fomented by the country's foreign enemies that want to see an end to the Islamic Republic system of government. FRONTRUNNER Khamenei directly appoints six of the Guardian Council's 12 members, and analysts say he has a direct influence in who gets to run. The final list of eight candidates approved by the council includes Saeed Jalili, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator who once worked in Khamenei's office; Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, a close aide and relative of Khamenei; and Ali Akbar Velayati, a foreign policy advisor to the supreme leader. Jalili, who has overseen a hardening in Iran's position in nuclear talks with world powers, has emerged as a frontrunner, with the backing of the conservative establishment. He gained the endorsement on Tuesday of senior cleric and ultraconservative Ayatollah Mohammad Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi, who served as a religious mentor to Ahmadinejad but has since turned against the president, who fell out of favour with the clerical elite during his second four-year term. Mesbah-Yazdi's followers have great sway among Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards and the Basij volunteer paramilitary force. In his speech on Wednesday, Khamenei thanked those who had been rejected by the Guardian Council and had chosen to "obey the law". That could be read as a veiled criticism of Ahmadinejad who said he hoped the bar on his aide Mashaie running for president would be overturned before the election. (Editing by Marcus George and Robin Pomeroy) ============= U.S. casts doubt on credibility of Iran election Fri, May 24 13:18 PM EDT By Arshad Mohammed TEL AVIV (Reuters) - The United States on Friday called into question the credibility of Iran's presidential election next month, criticizing the disqualification of candidates and accusing Tehran of disrupting Internet access. On a visit to Israel, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry also warned that time was running out to resolve the deadlock over Iran's contested nuclear program. Iran's Guardian Council, the state body that vets all candidates, has barred a number of hopefuls from the roster in the June 14 ballot, including former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who is seen as sympathetic to reform. "The Council narrowed a list of almost seven hundred potential candidates down to...officials of their choice, based solely on who represents the regime's interests," Kerry said shortly before flying out of Israel. "That is hardly an election by standards which most people in most countries judge free, fair, open, accessible, accountable elections." Most of the remaining eight men left on the Iranian ballot are seen as loyalists to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Kerry, whose country's decades-old rift with Iran has widened over the latter's nuclear ambitions, said Washington saw "troubling signs" that the Iranian government was slowing down or cutting off Internet access to its citizens. "Ultimately the Iranian people (will) be prevented not only from choosing someone who might have reflected their point of view, but also taking part in a way that is essential to any kind of legitimate democracy," he said. Israel and most Western powers, including the United States, believe Iran is seeking to obtain nuclear weapons - something Tehran has denied. Israel, which is assumed to have its own nuclear arsenal, has warned it might attack Iran if it does not halt its atomic work, but Kerry said he hoped a diplomatic solution could still be found. "Our hope is, for the sake of the region, the world, the Iranian people, ourselves, that we can have a peaceful resolution, but it is going to have to be demonstrated much more affirmatively than it has been to date that Iran is interested in that kind of a solution," he said. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said this week in a report that Iran was trying to accelerate its uranium enrichment program. "The clock is clearly ticking," Kerry added. (Reporting by Arshad Mohammed; Writing by Crispian Balmer) (This story is refiled to fix typo in headline) =========================== Iran's rulers risk alienating voters by candidate bans Wed, May 22 08:51 AM EDT By Yeganeh Torbati and Marcus George DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran's clerical rulers may have sought to remove any challenge to their grip by barring two vivid contenders from next month's presidential election, but they risk alienating voters already disillusioned by the violent aftermath of the 2009 poll. The June 14 vote will have little bearing on the policies that have long put Iran at odds with the West - ranging from its nuclear program to its support for Syria's President Bashar al-Assad and Lebanon's Shi'ite Hezbollah guerrillas. These will remain firmly under the control of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has refused to curb sensitive atomic work despite crippling Western sanctions and Israeli and U.S. threats of military action. Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons. Yet Iran's rulers have always seen a high election turnout, as underpinning their legitimacy - hence the danger of voiding them of any credibility in the eyes of voters by using the many institutional levers available to limit free democratic choice. The Guardian Council, a vetting body, disqualified ex-President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, despite his hefty political role in the past three decades, as well as Esfandiar Rahim Mashaie, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's former chief of staff, leaving a field dominated by hardliners loyal to Khamenei. Ahmadinejad said on Wednesday he would ask Khamenei to reverse the ban on Mashaie. Rafsanjani, a pillar of the 1979 Islamic Revolution who has held a series of powerful positions in the past, will not appeal, his campaign chief said. Barring surprises, their elimination sets the stage for a Khamenei loyalist from the "principlist" camp to win - and will disappoint many Iranians, notably those from urban and middle-class backgrounds, who had hoped for a more open contest. "I feel indifferent," said a 33-year-old dissident journalist in Tehran who gave his name only as Hamed. "Most people feel the same as long as they don't have a say in the political arena, as long as the authorities are running the election and can rig the votes at will and as long as the ruling system can filter candidates at their own discretion." STAYING AT HOME A 27-year-old translator named Firouzeh said she had been undecided about whether to vote. "Thanks to the Guardian Council for disqualifying Hashemi (Rafsanjani). Now I can stay home on election day without any doubts," she said sarcastically. Khamenei is seen as wanting a more docile president than the turbulent populist Ahmadinejad, who had often challenged his authority, even though he had endorsed his divisive re-election. In theory the supreme leader could reinstate the two high-profile challengers in the race, but this seems unlikely. "Khamenei surely signaled to the Guardian Council ... that he did not want Rafsanjani or Mashaie to run," said Cliff Kupchan of Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy. "The leader wants a pliant president and a calm election." Ahmadinejad's 2009 triumph in a vote his opponents said was rigged led to the worst popular unrest in the Islamic Republic's history, severely damaging the ruling system's credentials. Rafsanjani earned hardliners' wrath at the time for criticizing authorities' treatment of protesters. His last-minute entry into the presidential race had already captured the interest of Iranian voters - something which may have prompted the decision to nip his candidacy in the bud. "I was really surprised by the ferment and the (pro-Rafsanjani) wave of joy that broke out in the country, and in my opinion this wave upset the principlists," Tehran University professor Sadeq Zibakalam told Asr-e Iran daily on Tuesday. Eshaq Jahangiri, head of Rafsanjani's campaign, was quoted in ISNA news agency on Wednesday as saying the veteran politician would not object to the Guardian Council's decision. Rafsanjani was a close associate of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, founder of the Islamic Republic, whose daughter has voiced dismay at the ban on her late father's one-time aide. "This act has no meaning other than creating a separation between two companions of the Imam (Khomeini) and a disregarding of the enthusiasm and interest of the people towards the system and the elections," Zahra Mostafavi wrote in a letter on the Jamaran news site, thought to be linked to Khomeini's family. "The gradual separation between the two of you (Khamenei and Rafsanjani) will be the biggest blow to the revolution and the system," she wrote. "The Imam always said: 'These two are good when they are together'." AHMADINEJAD'S OPTIONS Ahmadinejad, who cannot run for a third consecutive term himself, said he would challenge the ban on Mashaie, calling him a "righteous person and beneficial for the country", ISNA said. Ahmadinejad has in the past threatened to reveal evidence of corruption by his rivals, though analysts said any such challenge to the ruling establishment would carry grave risks. "The institutional leverage available to the supreme leader and his allies will outweigh any evidence or anything that Ahmadinejad and his team have up their sleeve," said Yasmin Alem, a U.S.-based expert on Iran's electoral system. Hardliners loathe Mashaie, seeing him as figurehead of a "deviant" nationalist current bent on undermining clerical rule. Nevertheless, Ahmadinejad, an ambitious, fiery figure, seems reluctant to see his own political power eclipsed. The former Revolutionary Guard commander is thought to remain popular with many poorer Iranians, especially in the provinces, who have benefited from his cash handouts and local development projects. Two prominent reformists, former nuclear negotiator Hassan Rohani and Mohammad Reza Aref, a former vice-president under ex-President Mohammad Khatami, remain in the race but they lack the charisma and organization to make much impact, according to Ali Ansari, an Iran analyst at St Andrew's University in Scotland. He said Saeed Jalili, Iran's current nuclear negotiator, was emerging as the frontrunner among Khamenei loyalists who also include Tehran mayor Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf and former Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati. "Basically Jalili is the man to beat, this is how the script is intended to go now," Ansari said. "A nice, tidy election unless Ahmadinejad chooses to do something disruptive." The defeated opposition candidates in the 2009 election, Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karoubi, are under house arrest and their "Green Movement" has been cowed and suppressed. France said their fate showed that Iran's elections would be held in a "climate of growing repression" and criticized the bans imposed by the Guardian Council on would-be candidates. This "shows the extent the Iranian system is bolted", said Foreign Ministry spokesman Philippe Lalliot. "The eligibility criteria undeniably lacks transparency." ================== Pressure Mounts for Iran’s Moderate Candidates to Unite Posted on June 6, 2013 by Arash Karami With eight days left before the June 14 election and the unpredictable nature of Iranian presidential politics, Reformists and moderates have been exerting pressure on Mohammad Reza Aref and Hassan Rouhani to unite. Some fear that if Aref and Rouhani fail to unite, their votes there could be a repeat of 2005 election that brought the hard-line Ahmadinejad to power. Motahhareh Shaffei wrote in Arman newspaper that “It wasn’t that long ago in the 2005 election when the Reformists felt they didn’t need the support of Rafsanjani,” adding, “However, today the Reformists have felt that the country needs other elements … and despite their own political views, have decided to support a moderate candidate.” Well-known Reformists have essentially been sidelined from the political scene in Iran and some believe that supporting a so-called moderate candidate is the best path for them to achieve some of their goals. Shaffi wrote that of the potential candidates Reformists could support, “One is Hassan Rouhani and the other is Mohammad Reza Aref. Both are moderates and have taken the middle path, and no extreme action has been seen from either one of them.” On Monday, while campaigning in Iran’s Gazvin province, Aref, who was Khatami’s first vice president in Khatami’s second term and the minister of technology under Khatami’s first term, said of the possibility of building a coalition, he would “listen to Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani and Mohammad Khatami’s final opinion on the matter.” However, that same day, he told Mehr News in response to the possibility of a coalition that “A lot of news is published on this matter but I have no intention of doing this, and I will remain until the end of the election race.” On Tuesday, Mohammad Reza Nematzadeh, a member of Aref’s campaign staff, denied rumors that Aref would step aside in favor of Rouhani. Aref, who upon registering for the presidency said that he would pull out if Rafsanjani or Khatami decided to run, also complained about the last-minute nature of Iranian presidential politics. “Nowhere in the world do you see with one day left to register for the election, that there would be such big changes” Aref said. Aref continued, “Everywhere in the world, political parties introduce themselves, their policies and their staff one year before the elections. … Rafsanjani’s registration put all of my campaigning to rest and after 11 days [when the Guardian Council disqualified him], we began our campaigning again. Under these conditions, how can one expect us to talk about our activities and our cabinet?” Rafsanjani, Ahmadinejad ally Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei and Saeed Jalili all registered on May 12 for the presidential election, the final day of the one-week window, which is approximately one month before the June 14 election. On Sunday, Mohammad Ali Najafi said that that the coalition of Reformist groups had created a seven-member panel that would “negotiate with some of the leaders of the country and the two candidates under consideration (Aref and Rouhani) toward a coalition, and based on polling across the country, to create the necessary environment and mechanisms for a consensuses and coalition.” Najafi, who introduced himself as the spokesman for this panel, said, “When we reach a final decision, we will announce our single candidate on Saturday.” Neither Rafsanjani nor Khatami have endorsed a candidate in this election yet. It is not certain that they will. However, Khatami’s website did issue a statement from a council of Khatami’s advisers on Sunday that encouraged Rouhani and Aref to reach a coalition. ==============

Thursday, December 20, 2012

What will happen on Friday 21/12/2012

The subject of discussion at full what will happen on Friday 21/12/2012 The date of 21 December 2012 last date and the final page in the astronomical calendar is complicated by the Maya who lived in Central America and the foundations of civilization, discussed on that date in countless books and several sites on the Internet in addition to journals and articles as published as a headline in various newspapers around the world where divided enthusiasts for the upcoming event, which may conceal serious disaster to two: 1. Group predicted an imminent end of the world!! 2. another group which considers the renewal of the universe and the birth of consciousness. (The regular mission of some religions), which represented the difference between before the deluge of Noah (peace be upon him) and after Noah's flood, for example, What your expectations about what will happen? And God know everything (Translated by Bing) موضوع نقاش هااااام جدآآآآآآآآ ماذا سيحدث في يوم الجمعه 21\12\2012 يعتبر تاريخ 21 ديسمبر 2012 التاريخ الاخير والصفحة النهائية في تقويم فلكي معقد وضعه شعب المايا الذي عاش قديماً في أمريكا الوسطى وأسس حضارة ، نوقش معنى ذلك التاريخ في كتب لا حصر لها ومواقع عديدة على الإنترنت بالإضافة إلى المجلات والمقالات كما كان منشوراً كعنوان رئيسي في الصحف المختلفة حول العالم حيث انقسم المتحمسون لذلك الحدث المرتقب والذي قد يخفي كارثة خطيرة إلى فريقين: 1-فريق يتنبأ بنهاية وشيكة للعالم!! 2-وفريق آخر يرى فيه تجديد للكون وإعادة ولادة للوعي. ( إعادة البعث الدورية حسب مفهوم بعض الديانات)، أي مثل الفرق بين قبل طوفان نوح عليه السلام و بعد طوفان نوح مثلاً ما توقعاتكم عن ما سيحصل ؟ والله اعلم بكل شئ ================ Vladstradamus: Putin knows when world will end, not afraid of apocalypse Get short URL email story to a friendprint version Published: 20 December, 2012, 13:43 Edited: 20 December, 2012, 18:39 Russia's President Vladimir Putin holds the first major press conference of his third term in power in Moscow, on December 20, 2012 (AFP Photo / Kirill Kudryavtsev) As frenzied doomsayers around the world prepare for the apocalypse on December, 21, Russian President Vladimir Putin put his trust in science, saying at a yearly Q&A that the earth won’t end for another 4.5 billion years, when the sun goes out. “It will all end in 4.5 billion years, the reaction will stop and the Sun will turn into a White Dwarf… I don’t believe the world will end this year,” President Putin said during the press conference. Putin, known for enjoying large open-format discussions, held his traditional end-of-year Q&A with more than 1,000 journalists on Thursday. In a wide-ranging, four-hour discussion, the Russian president touched on topics both serious and silly, like Syria and the so-called Mayan apocalypse. Below are some of Putin’s most noteworthy quotes from the event: Russia's President Vladimir Putin holds the first major press conference of his third term in power in Moscow, on December 20, 2012 (AFP Photo / Natalia Kolesnikova) ­On banning the US child adoption bill: “I understand, it’s an emotional response from the State Duma, but I believe it is adequate.” On the reasoning behind the proposed ban:“We are grateful to those American citizens who follow the call of heart and adopt or want to adopt Russian children. They do it with dignity and in line with the high principles of humanism. But we also know about tragic cases, like the one where the child was left to die from heat in a locked car. The issue is not in those tragedies per se – children die here too. The issue is in the attitude of the authorities to such cases. People are spared punishment for such acts. That’s what the draft legislation is aimed to address.” On the Magnitsky Act:“The problem is that [the US] replaced one anti-Soviet law [the Jackson–Vanik amendment] with another one. They can’t live without it… This certainly poisons our relationship.” ­ ‘I am not morally prepared to turn the other cheek’ ­On anti-American rhetoric following the Magnitsky Act: “We don’t need anti-something rhetoric; it harms. But we are – or I am, for that matter – a bad Christian. When someone smites you on one cheek, you should turn to him the other. I am not morally prepared to act in this way. If we are slapped, we must respond. Or otherwise we’ll be constantly slapped… What’s worse, they [enacted a travel ban on Russian officials allegedly involved in human rights violations] without provocation. They are up to their necks in a certain substance themselves.” • Smite=To affect sharply with great feeling: He was smitten by deep remorse. On building an authoritarian regime for his personal power: “We have created stability, which is a necessary condition for development. But I can’t call this system authoritarian. I disagree with this thesis. The illustrative evidence against it is my decision to pull back to second position after my two terms. If I thought a totalitarian or an authoritarian system is preferable, I would just change the constitution. It would have been a simple thing to do. It wouldn’t even require a referendum. My decision was a deliberate pullback that ensured continuity of power and respected our laws.” On the reduction of Khodorkovsky’s prison term and Putin’s opinion of him: “There were certain amendments [providing milder punishments for economic crimes] to the law, and probably they provided the ground for taking this decision… There is no personal persecution here. Some people try to present it as a political case… Nothing like that. It was a purely economic crime. Just look at America. People get sentences of 99 years for economic crimes there.” Russia's President Vladimir Putin holds the first major press conference of his third term in power in Moscow, on December 20, 2012 (AFP Photo / Kirill Kudryavtsev) ­ ‘I will leave my office sooner or later’ On retiring and his future successor: “It’s not my job to entrust the country to somebody. It’s the job of the citizens… As for me, I will certainly sooner or later leave my office. I do care about whom will then lead the country… I am telling this with no grain of irony. I want the future leadership of the country, including the future president, to be even more successful and lucky [than my team]. It’s because I love Russia." On rumors of illness:“My comment on my health is traditional: Wait on… [Such rumors] are benefiting the political opponents, who want to question the authorities’ legitimacy and sanity.” Russia's President Vladimir Putin holds the first major press conference of his third term in power in Moscow, on December 20, 2012 (AFP Photo / Natalia Kolesnikova) ­ ‘Russia not concerned about Assad’ ­On losing ground in the Middle East over supporting Syrian President Bashar Assad against the West and Arab League:“Didn’t Russia lose its ground in Libya after what the intervening countries did there? However they justified their position, the state is crumbling. Conflicts between clans are continuing… We are not concerned about what happens with Assad. We realize that his family has been in power for 40 years and that change is needed. We care about what happens afterwards. We want a solution that would save Syria from dissolution and from a never-ending civil war.” On alleged corruption in the defense ministry: “Overall [former Defense Minister] Serdyukov can be praised for what he did to modernize the army. There were issues over his executive style, but that wasn’t why I retired him… Whether anything was stolen or not is for a court to judge. I can assure you that the prosecution will be absolutely objective. Nobody wants to blanch over anyone.” Russia's President Vladimir Putin holds the first major press conference of his third term in power in Moscow, on December 20, 2012 (AFP Photo / Natalia Kolesnikova) ­ ‘If Depardieu really wants one… he will get a Russian passport’ ­On Depardieu: “If Gerard really wants to have a residence permit or a Russian passport, you can consider it done, the issue solved positively… I am sure [French] officials didn’t want to insult Gerard, but just as any officials, they protect their policies, the decisions they take… There is a saying: ‘Anyone can hurt an artist.’ I sympathize with Mr. Depardieu’s feelings, but I admit I feel that despite his statements he considers himself a European and a citizen of the world.”On Muslim headscarves in schools: “Our culture – I mean our traditional Islam – we don’t have it. I attended once a major Muslim event, an international conference, where we have an observer status. It was a gathering of almost all prominent figures of the Muslim world. And one of them spoke to the public: ‘What are we doing? We forbid our girls and women to be educated. We drape them in burqas. With our hands we hamper our development!’ So if Islamic figures say this is not necessary, why should we introduce alien traditions?” Russia's President Vladimir Putin holds the first major press conference of his third term in power in Moscow, on December 20, 2012 (AFP Photo / Kirill Kudryavtsev) On daughters and becoming a grandfather: “Do you really need to know that? Well, my children are fine. They are in Moscow. They study and also work part-time. Everything is fine for them both in private life and in terms of career. I am proud of them.” On ending the Q&A session: “All right, folks. Thank you very much. We all know that we can’t finish our session, just like one can’t finish refurnishing his home. We can only stop it. My apologies to those who didn’t get a chance to ask their questions or didn’t hear what they wanted to hear for an answer. Thank you and goodbye.”­ During his first two terms as president, Putin gave seven such press conferences, and the Q&A sessions became longer each time. In 2008, President Putin answered questions for 4 hours and 40 minutes. Putin brought the press conference to an end after 4 hours and 33 minutes, falling seven minutes short of his previous record. ========= قال رفسنجاني «الفساد والأكاذيب والنفاق والتدخل في الحياة الخاصة والتضخم، والبطالة دليل على فشل النظام فاذا كان النظام الإسلامي لا يمكن أن يحقق ما وعد به الناس، فهذا يعني فشل هذا النظام، وينبغي تعويض الأخطاء» واضاف: إن السياسة والاقتصاد باتتا في «أيدي عديمي الخبرة، والمقربين من المسؤولين». هاشمي رفسنجاني رئيس مجلس تشخيص مصلحة النظام الايراني الأسبق موجهاً انتقادات شديدة إلى النظام الإيراني، ويتهمه بالفساد والفشل، مع تصاعد الجدل في ايران حول قانون الانتخابات الجديد بين المعارضين والمؤيدين. Rafsanjani said "corruption, lies and hypocrisy and interference in private life, inflation, and unemployment is proof the system fails if the Islamic regime could not achieve promised people, it means that system failed, and the error should be compensated» added: that politics and economics are in the hands of inexperienced, and associates of those responsible. Hashemi Rafsanjani, Chairman of Iran's powerful expediency Council, former directed harsh criticism to the Iranian regime, and accuse him of corruption and failure, with mounting debate in Iran about the new electoral law between opponents and supporters. =============

Monday, July 06, 2009

Clerical Leaders Defy Ayatollah on Iran Election

By MICHAEL SLACKMAN and NAZILA FATHI
Published: July 4, 2009

CAIRO — An important group of religious leaders in Iran called the disputed presidential election and the new government illegitimate on Saturday, an act of defiance against the country’s supreme leader and the most public sign of a major split in the country’s clerical establishment.


A statement by the group, the Association of Researchers and Teachers of Qum, represents a significant, if so far symbolic, setback for the government and especially the authority of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, whose word is supposed to be final. The government has tried to paint the opposition and its top presidential candidate, Mir Hussein Moussavi, as criminals and traitors, a strategy that now becomes more difficult.

“This crack in the clerical establishment, and the fact they are siding with the people and Moussavi, in my view is the most historic crack in the 30 years of the Islamic republic,” said Abbas Milani, director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. “Remember, they are going against an election verified and sanctified by Khamenei.”

The announcement came on a day when Mr. Moussavi released documents detailing a campaign of fraud by the current president’s supporters, and as a close associate of the supreme leader called Mr. Moussavi and former President Mohammad Khatami “foreign agents,” saying they should be treated as criminals.

The documents, published on Mr. Moussavi’s Web site, accused supporters of the president of printing more than 20 million extra ballots before the vote and handing out cash bonuses to voters.

Since the election, the bulk of the clerical establishment in the holy city of Qum, an important religious and political center of power, has remained largely silent, leaving many to wonder when, or if, the nation’s senior religious leaders would jump into the controversy that has posed the most significant challenge to the country’s leadership since the Islamic Revolution.

With its statement Saturday, the association of clerics came down squarely on the side of the reform movement.

The group had earlier asked for the election to be nullified because so many Iranians objected to the results, but it never directly challenged the legitimacy of the government and, by extension, the supreme leader.

The earlier statement also came before the election was certified by the country’s religious leaders, who have since said that opposition to the results must cease.

The clerics’ decision to speak up again is not itself a turning point and could fizzle under pressure from the state, which has continued to threaten its critics. Some seminaries in Qum rely on the government for funds, and Ayatollah Khamenei and the man he has declared the winner of the election, incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, have powerful backers there.

They also retain the support of the powerful security forces and the elite Revolutionary Guards. In addition, the country’s highest-ranking clerics have yet to speak out individually against the election results.

But the association’s latest statement does help Mr. Moussavi, Mr. Khatami and a former speaker of Parliament, Mehdi Karroubi, who have been the most vocal in calling the election illegitimate and who, in their attempts to force change, have been hindered by the jailing of influential backers.

“The significance is that even within the clergy, there are many who refuse to recognize the legitimacy of the election results as announced by the supreme leader,” said an Iranian political analyst who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal.

While the government could continue vilifying the three opposition leaders, analysts say it was highly unlikely that the leadership would use the same tactic against the clerical establishment in Qum.

The backing also came at a sensitive time for Mr. Moussavi, because the accusations that he is a foreign agent ran in a newspaper, Kayhan, that has often been used to build cases against critics of the government.

The editorial was written by Hossein Shariatmadari
, who was picked by the supreme leader to run the newspaper.

The clerics’ statement chastised the leadership for failing to adequately study complaints of vote rigging and lashed out at the use of force in crushing huge public protests.

It even directly criticized the Guardian Council, the powerful group of clerics charged with certifying elections.

“Is it possible to consider the results of the election as legitimate by merely the validation of the Guardian Council?” the association said.

Perhaps more threatening to the supreme leader, the committee called on other clerics to join the fight against the government’s refusal to adequately reconsider the charges of voter fraud. The committee invoked powerful imagery, comparing the 20 protesters killed during demonstrations with the martyrs who died in the early days of the revolution and the war with Iraq, asking other clerics to save what it called “the dignity that was earned with the blood of tens of thousands of martyrs.”

The statement was posted on the association’s Web site late Saturday and carried on many other sites, including the Persian BBC, but it was impossible to reach senior clerics in the group to independently confirm its veracity.

The statement was issued after a meeting Mr. Moussavi had with the committee 10 days ago and a decision by the Guardian Council to certify the election and declare that all matters concerning the vote were closed.

But the defiance has not ended.

With heavy security on the streets, there is a forced calm. But each day, slowly, another link falls from the chain of government control. Last week, in what appeared a coordinated thrust, Mr. Moussavi, Mr. Karroubi and Mr. Khatami all called the new government illegitimate. On Saturday, Mr. Milani of Stanford said, former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani met with families of those who had been arrested, another sign that he was working behind the scenes to keep the issue alive.

“I don’t ever remember in the 20 years of Khamenei’s rule where he was clearly and categorically on one side and so many clergy were on the other side,” Mr. Milani said. “This might embolden other clergy to come forward.”


Many of the accusations of fraud posted on Mr. Moussavi’s Web site Saturday had been published before, but the report did give some more specific charges.

For instance, although the government had announced that two of the losing presidential contenders had received relatively few votes in their hometowns, the documents stated that some ballot boxes in those towns contained no votes for the two men.

Michael Slackman reported from Cairo, and Nazila Fathi from Toronto.